Practical question of legality of the Rev

Practical question of legality of the Rev

1857.

3rd.-This new 4th anniversary away from Court “Top and you can Anchor” A great.O.F. got well known by the a lunch at the Buddy. Franklin’s, Hallway Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood filled the new chair, also it is stated that the newest Legal following consisted of 90 participants.

Jan

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, Roentgen. Roentgen. white male Dortmund female relationships B. Norman, Burton, and you will J. Bayly was actually chose the people in the general public Collection Committee.

p. 207 The body off a great whale, that has been drawn at the Winterton, was being exhibited with the Church Ordinary.

Brand new Rev. W. D. Wade, the minister out-of St. Mary’s, Southtown, had, before you leave Southsea, been given a purse out of ?61.

twenty-first.-The fresh new “Sisters” got into the collision which have one of several stone piers from the newest Connection, that it got considerably damaged.

Feb. last.-A keen Anti-Taxation fulfilling is stored during the Town Hall. The latest Mayor presided, plus the pursuing the took part in the proceedings:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you can J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared to be the newest mover within this count.

Feb. twenty-first.-A beneficial “Poor’s Speed” appointment is held from the Masonic Hall. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you will a resolution protesting up against the 1s. 6d. every quarter rate is actually accompanied. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Regal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you can F. Starling spoke about them, as the carry out of your Guardians try defended of the Mr. J. H. Harrison, among the many Panel.

Feb. 25th.-A case and this excited significant focus, had been read at the State Legal, Tolhouse-hallway, up until the Legal (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The new plaintiff try Mr. John Cobb, fabric merchant, to own whom Mr. C. H. Chamberlin appeared; the fresh new defendants were Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you may Grams. D. Palmer, who had been illustrated by the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The newest plaintiff stated that he was an applicant for the work environment from Councillor into the age such as in the solicitation of Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you will Grams. D. Palmer. During the time he became an applicant he extremely advised all of them which he would not spend away from his own pocket way more than simply ?10 into expenses of your own election, plus it try realized your Liberal cluster, that he belonged, manage subscribe the remainder. The evening through to the election he acquired an estimate from what the costs have been probably be, plus result of he at once spotted one another Mr. Burroughs and you can Mr. G. D. Palmer. You to definitely estimate, the guy noticed, amounted in order to regarding ?forty five, while the memberships completely amounted in order to however, ?42. Immediately after particular conversation it accessible to hold him harmless of level of the costs which could exceed the sum authorized, and he and you can Mr. Burroughs next went p. 208 to your Panel-room of one’s North-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs said they’d produced plans because of their friend John Cobb winning the market industry-ward. The costs of one’s election, that he (the plaintiff) shed, amounted altogether so you’re able to ?58 1s. 7d. The bill, thus, that he today stated in the defendants are ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-The brand new plaintiff, when you look at the cross-test from the Mr. Cufaude, acknowledge one to ?39 of one’s whole number try getting – -.-Mr. Cufaude contended if, since the plaintiff stated, the newest defendants had offered your a vow to your extra expenditures, the make sure must come in creating. And you will, just in case evidence is correct, and this, although not, he disputed, it had been hopeless into plaintiff to recover, inasmuch when he himself had acceptance one to a large part from the full costs is actually to own – -, which had been an illegal operate.-Mr. Chamberlin contended your plaintiff, immediately after acquiring the fresh new promise regarding the defendants, acted simply abreast of brand new believe of the promise, and that thus, as they got joined abreast of an involvement to invest the bucks, they certainly were accountable. The money, furthermore, was not spent from the plaintiff, but by the committee designated in order to run the fresh election, and up until the election are more than, this new plaintiff wasn’t aware that the currency got become spent inside the – -.-His Honour told you it absolutely was obvious the latest be certain that should have started written down. He was out-of viewpoint, and, the plaintiff was not destined to afford the illegal costs, and consequently he may maybe not bring their action for cash which he stated.-The new plaintiff was, correctly, non-correct.